
As a senior barrister, Alan Sullivan QC of Sydney has plenty he could boast about. But boasting barristers is also what he took aim at in a post that saw almost 160 comments and 1000 likes.
The barrister who has been a Silk since 1990 has been heavily involved in commercial, neglgience and sports law matters among others. But his recent post on LinkedIn chastised his bretheren who regularly trumpet their court successes.
His post received multiple comments and shares askinig why he remained on the site, although there had been “inspirational stories of will triumphing over adversity and forgiveness trumping hatred or revenge”
But it was the self promotional drivel he most hated, noting –
But overall this has just become a naked selfish advertising and marketing tool for people with false modesty to say how terrific they are.
I am particularly ashamed of my fellow barristers who use this platform to boast about their victories.
I haven’t seen any of them talk about their losses. And any experienced barrister knows that often their best performances result in loss. That is because of the cab rank rule. Barristers have to take cases even though they would prefer not to.
As someone frequently included in “ beauty contest” lists of best lawyers etc over many years without any solicitation or marketing on my part , I must say I am gobsmacked by how many of my colleagues with , what I regard as false humility, race to publicise such “achievements” on this site.
Personally , I have never regarded being on such lists as important, accurate or satisfying. They are cynical money making beauty contests .
Let’s remember we are in a profession not a business.

The Sullivan Bio: Specialising in commercial law, equity, sports law , professional negligence and appellate advocacy. Former Chair of the NSWRL and ARL judiciaries, current Senior Commissioner , Cricket Australia Conduct Commission, member of Court of Arbitration for Sport since 2000, Deputy Chair of the Adjudicatory Chamber of the FIFA Ethics Committee 2013-2017, current President of the FFA Appeals Tribunal. Recipient of the 2017 ANZSLA Award for lifetime contribution to sport and sports law. Member of the National Board of the Men of League Foundation.
Read More on LawFuel
- Japan’s Biggest Publishers Just Sued Perplexity AI for $44mBezos-Backed Perplexity AI Accused of Free-Riding on Journalism Journalists aren’t thrilled about… Read more: Japan’s Biggest Publishers Just Sued Perplexity AI for $44m
- AI Is Smarter Than You—Until It Lies. Here’s How Your Firm Will Go Up in Flames If You Let ItGenerative AI is everywhere, but when lawyers used it, two ended up sanctioned for fake citations it’s time to cue the panic or – much better – privot to control and oversight of what your legal AI efforts are doing. Here we look at some of the key steps law firms should take to avoid the risks increasingly associated with generative AI tools.
- Lawyers Built This AI to Read Judges’ Minds — And BigLaw Is Already HookedAnd Now Legal AI That Sees Into the Judge’s Mind . .… Read more: Lawyers Built This AI to Read Judges’ Minds — And BigLaw Is Already Hooked
- £65m Lifeline or Financial Casket? Pogust Goodhead’s Hedge-Driven Drama UnfoldsA Hedge Fund Lifeline – With Strings Attached Ben Thomson, LawFuel contributing… Read more: £65m Lifeline or Financial Casket? Pogust Goodhead’s Hedge-Driven Drama Unfolds
- Harmeet Dhillon’s DOJ Shake-UpDhillon DOJ: A Purge or a Reset? Ben Thomson, LawFuel contributing editor… Read more: Harmeet Dhillon’s DOJ Shake-Up
- Burford Capital Isn’t Just Financing Suits Anymore; It’s Trying to Own the Firm TooBurford Capital the litigation finance behemoth wants not just to bankroll lawsuits but to buy stakes in actual U.S. law firms. The move isn’t your garden-variety PE play; it’s a direct challenge to the profession’s no-capital-external-to-the-firm orthodoxy. Burford, under the ever-quotable Jonathan Molot, (pictured above) told the Financial Times he is floating a structure ripped from healthcare and accounting playbooks: split a law firm into two entities, a lawyer-owned practice handling client work, and a Managed Service Organization (MSO) holding assets and providing back‑office muscle in exchange for a cut. It’s a classic “external capital without violating ethics rules.”