#Himtoo – How Men Are Losing Out to Women in Law Recruitment

#Himtoo - How Men Are Losing Out to Women in Law Recruitment 2

#Himtoo - How Men Are Losing Out to Women in Law Recruitment 3The flip side of #Metoo is the need to employ ‘superior’ men, requiring positive discrimination in the view of Australian law firm Lander & Rogers.

The firm ranks highly on The Australian Financial Review Law Partnership Survey, with 37 per cent of partners being female and with 76 per cent of senior associates being female also.

The reason, according to the firm Chief Executive Genevieve Collins is that women present much better at interviews

#Himtoo - How Men Are Losing Out to Women in Law Recruitment 4
 Genevieve Collins

The only other firm in the survey of Australian law firms with more than 50 partners was Maddocks, which is also headed by a female CEO in Michelle Dixon.

Stark Differences

“Have you ever interviewed kids coming out of uni in their early 20s? The women interview so much better. If we didn’t practise positive affirmative action for males, we wouldn’t have any males,” Ms Collins said.

“It’s stark. They [women] just mature earlier; they are more nuanced and emotionally intelligent at that age.”

#Himtoo - How Men Are Losing Out to Women in Law Recruitment 5
Image: AFR: Maddocks CEO Michelle Dixon 

Maddocks do not display any conscious bias, they say, as their system involves blind CVs or resumes, but they have had more female graduates joining for a long time, Michelle Dixon told the paper.

“I’m not sure why, but women are either doing better at university or in the interview process.”

The Top 10 law firm partnership survey of senior associates are as below – 

#Himtoo - How Men Are Losing Out to Women in Law Recruitment 6

“And we don’t know if they are men or women when we are selecting between male and female interviewers and candidates is something that has taken on some more importance in recent times.

A Forbes article for instance, indicated that millennial recruiters put more emphasis on conversation skills and enthusiasm, while recruiters older than 50 emphasize the candidate’s knowledge of the industry and appearance.

ReFuel with the top law news weekly that's fun to read
Powered by ConvertKit

2 thoughts on “#Himtoo – How Men Are Losing Out to Women in Law Recruitment”

  1. Pingback: #Himtoo – How Men Are Losing Out to Women in Law Recruitment – Lawfuel | Affirmative Action

  2. You should also publish the number of women vs men who go to law school and their grade averages. My law school had well over 50% women and women tended to have higher grades generally. In fact this has been the case for some time. Considering this, there is a massive lack of women partners in these same firms.

    In saying that, I wholeheartedly believe that firms should not be hiring or promoting based on gender, male or female unless absolutely necessary (affirmative action). I have seen a few women get promoted in recent years when I thought someone else (a man) was more deserving, It seemed like the firm was just trying to get their numbers up. I do not agree with that, people should get the job based on their own merit.

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top