SEC Charges 7 Chruch Leaders in Fraudulent Investment Scheme that Targeting Parishioners

Washington, D.C., April ­14, 2009 (LAWFUEL) – The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged seven leading members of a church in Queens, N.Y. for orchestrating a fraudulent investment scheme that targeted mostly elderly parishioners. The seven individuals defrauded investors of more than $12 million by making numerous misrepresentations, including promises of returns as high as 75 percent, to encourage them to invest in two hedge funds – the Logos Fund and the Donum Fund. Instead of investing the money as promised, the defendants misappropriated millions of dollars to furnish their own lavish lifestyles with purchases of luxury cars, jewelry, clothing, meals, and expensive foreign travel.

Robert Khuzami, Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, said, “Affinity fraud is a particularly sinister scam that exploits investors in close-knit communities. The SEC has recently brought enforcement actions against fraudsters who have deceived members of the deaf community, religious groups, and various minority groups. Today’s action is especially egregious, as church leaders targeted their own parishioners and betrayed the sincere trust placed in them.”

James Clarkson, Acting Director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office, said, “This case sends a strong message that the SEC will not tolerate frauds by investment managers against vulnerable members of their own community. The fact that many of the victims of this scheme were senior citizens and members of the same church as the defendants makes this fraud particularly reprehensible.”

The SEC’s complaint, filed in federal court in Brooklyn, N.Y., charges Isaac I. Ovid, Aaron Riddle, J. Jonathan Coleman, Stephen Cina, Cory A. Martin, Timothy Smith, and Robert J. Riddle – who are leading members of the church. The SEC also charged the two entities used to carry out the fraudulent scheme: Jadis Capital, Inc. – the hedge fund manager of the Logos Fund and the Donum Fund – and Jadis Capital’s subsidiary – Jadis Investments LLC – a registered investment adviser and the investment manager of the funds.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that between January and November 2005, the defendants raised more than $12 million from more than 80 investors in the two funds by making material misrepresentations including promises of incredible returns. The defendants misrepresented the performance of the Logos Fund, the amount of assets under management, the identity and skill of the portfolio managers, and the level of supervision of the portfolio managers. The defendants also misrepresented the registration status of the Donum Fund by falsely claiming to investors that the fund was registered with the SEC.

The SEC further alleges that instead of investing the money as promised, the defendants misappropriated investor funds almost as soon as they were obtained, using the money to buy luxury items including a Bentley automobile and expensive watches. They also used investor assets to pay for unauthorized operating expenses incurred by Jadis Capital and Jadis Investments, such as the construction of lavish offices, and to satisfy prior debts owed by Ovid.

The SEC’s complaint charges each of the defendants (except Logos Fund) with violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and with aiding and abetting each other’s violation of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Further, the SEC’s complaint charges Jadis Investments and Jadis Capital with violations of Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and each of the defendants (except Logos Fund and Robert J. Riddle) with aiding and abetting Jadis Investments’ and Jadis Capital’s violation of Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Advisers Act. Finally, the complaint charges Jadis Investments with a violation of Section 203A of the Advisers Act, and Logos Fund with a violation of Section 7(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The SEC’s complaint seeks a final judgment permanently enjoining the defendants from future violations of the above provisions of the federal securities laws, ordering them to disgorge their ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest, and ordering them to pay financial penalties.

The SEC acknowledges the assistance and cooperation of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Scroll to Top