Dan Garner* Dentons has entered the New Zealand legal market today with the formal association with New Zealand’s fifth largest law firm Kensington Swan showing its continued global growth strategy as the largest law firm n th world..
But for Dentons, the move is but the latest in a string of deals that have seen them head the list of law firms globally by head count.
Dentons are the largest law firm in the world with over 17,000 staff globally and with 11,000 lawyers and global revenues of over $US2 billion.
Dentons was founded in March 2013 by the merger of SNR Denton, headquartered in Washington and London, Fraser Milner Casgrain, a leading Canadian law firm and Salans, an international firm based in Paris.
While Dentons was growing strongly the really big move cam in 2015 when the then 2,600-lawyer Dentons combined with a 4,000-lawyer Chinese law firm, Dacheng Law Offices.
Reaching its now massive size saw the firm continue to roll up smaller firms until the present day.
It also has the most offices of any law firm in the world, covering every continent and operating in almost 80 countries with 182 offices. It has recently temporarily closed its Wuhan office, where it has seven lawyers employed, in the wake of the coronavirus outbreak.
Kensington Swan has around 120 staff and is the fifth largest New Zealand law firm, which is now known as Dentons Kensington Swan and is the latest to do a Dentons tie-up, the most recent being Pittsburgh-based Cohen & Grigsby who tied-up with the firm at the end of January.
Under New Zealand legislation local law firms must be owned by lawyers registered in New Zealand and the Dentons deal with Kensington Swan does not see money changing hands, but is likely to increase revenues for the local firm who can deploy Dentons’ global reach.
A ‘Polycentric’ Law Firm
Dentons describes itself as a ‘polycentric’ law firm without a single headquarters or dominant national culture.
In Australia, where the firm has offices across the country, it has recently introduced a fixed price legal billing model, called the
The concept permits clients to access as much or as little advice as they require using Dentons’ online tool thus providing certainty in legal pricing. It also permits the firm to see what legal issues or areas of risk their lawyers are being requested to provide and to provide a picture of the legal requirements.
The intention is to roll out the ‘Virtual Counsel’ tool internationally after trialing it in Australia.
The firm rejects the ‘colonist’ approach of major firms who send lawyers to far flung areas to handle legal work and prefers to have their own, local lawyers handle it, as global CEO Elliott Portnoy said in a recent interview:
“Dentons has an entirely different approach, we do whole-firm combinations in each of those markets with the leading local law firms with deep roots in the community and outstanding talent. So, we offer very different client propositions than our competitors.”
Denton’s Polygamous ‘Issue’
Dentons undeniable success and growth has not been without some obvious growing pains. A recent awkward issue for the legal giant has been the issue of how to impose a code of conduct upon a firm of over 10,000 lawyers across 70 countries.
Specifically, what do you do about claims reported in American Lawyer that the Riyadh office in Saudi Arabia employs polygamous men who marry ‘at will’ and divorce with equal casualness.
The claims also allege that a Dentons lawyer allegedly authored an article for Cage, a controversial Islamic organization and in which the author called Americans “blood thirsty” and predicted the killing of Osama Bin Laden would lead to the destruction of America.
Dentons have said that the lawyer has denied writing the article, but UK law site RollOnFriday wrote its own account of Dentons’ investigation Feb. 7.)
Dentons issued a statement saying: “Promptly after receiving an anonymous communication containing allegations against certain personnel in our Saudi Arabia offices, we attempted to engage with the anonymous sender and initiated an investigation of the claims. Our efforts to engage with the sender of the anonymous communications have not been reciprocated. We take any allegation of violations of the law or Dentons Global Code of Conduct very seriously, and we have undertaken a thorough investigation of the claims involving both internal and external resources, which is ongoing.”
Managing a MegaFirm
Managing a firm of Dentons size is always an issue and a recent Canadian lawsuit for $25 million has also created a headache with allegations of gross overbilling, conflict of interest and other matters.
The firm vigorously denies the allegations and intends proving its position, but it does indicate the issues that can arise from growth and continued expansion.
It’s desire to build a truly national US law firm has shown its aggressive approach to growth.
As Portnoy said, “We are enormously excited about the effort and it begins with our assessment that there is no “truly national” law firm in the United States.
“Many firms hold themselves as national law firms but in reality, when you see where they meet their client needs, it is remarkable that the global law firms or even the US law firms don’t exist in all top 10 legal markets and none of them are in all 20 of the top 20 legal markets. These are very significant legal markets with outstanding clients, lawyers, and business operations.”
The firm has continued to both open new offices and to build its brand, receiving recognition for its brand awareness and multi-jurisdictional ‘reach’ as it continues on its expansion path.
And the expansion creates an issue, according to John Coffee, (left) a professor of law and director of the Center of Corporate Governance at Columbia Law School.
“You can’t run an 11,000-lawyer firm like Dentons and think you’re really practicing law — you’re running an acquisitions business,” he said.
Author
*Dan Garner is a LawFuel legal contributor who has written on Big Law issues for several years, including on legal tech implications and mergers for law firms.
Latest Headlines on LawFuel
- Sex, Secrecy, and AI -How the Eleanor Ross Scandal Blew Up ‘Confidential’ Judicial Discipline
- The OpenAI Defense: Inside the Wachtell Trial Team That Just Beat Elon MuskWhile Elon Musk’s legal team tried to transform a federal courtroom in Oakland, California into an existential debate about the fate of human civilization and a “stolen charity,” Sam Altman’s defenders quietly built a procedural guillotine. A unanimous nine-member federal advisory jury took less than two hours to reject all of Musk’s claims against OpenAI, CEO Sam Altman, and President Greg Brockman, which presumably was both surprising and disappointing for the multi-billionaire. U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers immediately adopted the verdict from the bench, dismissing the case in full. The same statute-of-limitations finding wiped out Musk’s aiding-and-abetting claim against Microsoft, an early backer of OpenAI’s for-profit arm. Log in to the the lawyer profiles . . .
- From 40 Hours To 4: Is AI Forcing A $200 Billion Rewrite Of The BigLaw Billable Hour?
- Australian Firm Thomsons Bets on AI With Launch of New AI Legal Brand
- Quinn Emanuel Hit With $3M Sanctions as Judge Blasts “Deeply Disturbing” Litigation Conduct
- Trainee To Equity Partner: The 12-Year BigLaw Timeline, Mapped HonestlyRoughly one in twenty associates who start at a top US firm will make equity partner there. That is the number nobody puts in the recruiting brochure. The brochure says the partnership track is “approximately eight to ten years.” That is technically true and practically misleading — because it describes the timeline of people who finish, not the probability of finishing. The honest answer is that the BigLaw partnership track is a twelve-year funnel with five stages, four exit ramps, and a survival rate that would not pass muster as a clinical trial outcome. Here is what each stage actually looks like. Log in to read timeline . . .
- Top 8 Legal Answering Services for Law Firms in 2026
- Panel Games: Revolut’s New Legal Model is a Quarterly Hunger Games for Big LawIf you’re a partner at a Magic Circle firm currently leaning back in your Herman Miller chair, comforted by the warmth of a three-year panel appointment, you might want to sit up. The fintech disruptor that refuses to play by the rules is, predictably, about to break yours. Revolut, the neobank recently valued at a staggering $45 billion following a secondary share sale (with some internal projections whispering closer to $75 billion), is officially binning the traditional legal panel model. In its place comes “Revolut Partners,” a system designed to treat law firms less like venerable institutions and more like high-performance software vendors. Log in to read more . .
- The Partner Who Signed the Brief: Inside Morgan & Morgan’s $5,000 AI LessonIf you wanted a single case to put on the cover of every CLE brochure for the next five years, Wadsworth v. Walmart Inc. would do nicely. A hoverboard explodes in a Wyoming family’s home. The family sues. Their lawyers — from America’s loudest plaintiffs’ firm, no less — file a motion in limine citing nine cases. Eight of them do not exist. They have never existed. They were, in the now-familiar verb of our age, hallucinated. And so on 24 February 2025, U.S. District Judge Kelly H. Rankin handed down what is shaping up to be the defining American sanctions order of the generative-AI era. Rudwin Ayala — the Morgan & Morgan associate who actually fed the brief into the firm’s in-house AI tool, charmingly named MX2.law — lost his pro hac vice admission and was fined $3,000. Log in to read . . .
