The British litigation funder behind the multimillion dollar class action brought by Adina Thorn against Carter Holt Harvey for its Shadowclad product has unexpectedly ended when the funder pulled out of the funding arrangement, for unknown reasons.
- 1 The British litigation funder behind the multimillion dollar class action brought by Adina Thorn against Carter Holt Harvey for its Shadowclad product has unexpectedly ended when the funder pulled out of the funding arrangement, for unknown reasons.
- 1.0.1 Jacque Lethbridge Resigns From NZLS In Wake of Heron Report
- 1.0.2 Tech Partner Joins Duncan Cotterill Taking Firm Partner Number to 49
- 1.0.3 AIA Face $700,000 Penalty Following FMA Court Proceeding
- 1.0.4 Former NZ Law Society CEO Takes New Role
- 1.0.5 Olivia Wensley – New Entrant & Legal Workplace Activist On The LawFuel Power List
- 1.0.6 Former Lane Neave Partner Joins Wynn Williams
The widely publicised class action that sought around $40 million was launched in 2018 and Carter Holt have made no concessions and are set to also obtain substantial security for costs paid to them following the discontinuance.
The case came at a time when many issues and cases were being launched over monolithic cladding products that had previously been used and was initially scheduled to last four months and has faced stringent opposition from Carter Holt.
The Carter Holt claim did not include Government compensation claimed for school cladding issues.
That case saw the Ministry of Education seeking compensation of between $1.1b and $1.3b from Carter Holt Harvey for defective materials affecting 800 schools around the country. The terms of the settlement are confidential.
The plaintiffs in the Adina Thorn-lead class action had brought a representative claim against Carter Holt in relation to Shadowclad, a form of external cladding made from pine.
The claim is funded a by an offshore litigation funder. Carter Holt previously applied to stay the claim as an abuse of process saying in a hearing in 2019 that the claim had been brought without Court permission and objecting to allegedly misleading statements designed to promote the claim via press releases, media interviews and the like.
Judge Matthew Downs dismissed Carters Holt Harvey’s application to throw the case out, though his decision referred to a “whiff of overstatement” in one statement Thorn made saying the plaintiffs’ case was “exactly the same” as the Crown case in an interview with Stuff.
Justice Downs also found Thorn had made misleading statements about how much the claim was for, telling one news organisation in 2017 that it potentially exceeded $100m.
The recently elected president of the New Zealand Law Society, Jacque Lethbridge, has resigned from…
Duncan Cotterill have been joined by technology and privacy lawyer Peter Fernando. >> Latest Law…
The Auckland High Court has ordered life insurer AIA to pay a pecuniary penalty of $700,000 for…
Joanna Simon’s short term at the New Zealand Law Society as CEO has seen her…
“It was like a frat house” – she said of one law firm Queenstown mayoral…
Wynn Williams have recruited former Lane Neave partner Paula Nicolaou, a lawyer who has specialised…