Washington D.C. is the latest jurisdiction to look at whether the rules surrounding law firm ownership should be changed.
Bloombergs report that DC’s bar is to look at alternatives to the present law firm ownership rules, saying it will look at the evolving legal service delivery models, which includes non-lawyer ownership of law firms.
Bar members will have the opportunity to express their views on proposed changes, which would involve fee-sharing and other “alternative business structures” might prove beneficial to firms and their clients.
Such changes have been supported by access to justice advocates across the country who seek more affordable options for Americans seeking legal help. But opponents of rule changes have expressed concerns, including about threats posed to attorney independence and legal ethics, Bloomberg Big Law Business report.
Changes to law firm ownership have already been examined in Arizona, California, and Utah, as well as Chicago, which for the last several months have been weighing similar changes.
Many proposed changes involve modifying Bar Rule 5.4 and its strict limits on law firm ownership.
Andrew Perlman, dean of Suffolk Law School in Boston, said in a written statement that the D.C. Bar announcement is “an encouraging development.”
“Decades ago, D.C. became a leader in this area, and D.C. has the opportunity once again to play a leadership role,” he said.
Big Four Interest
The possibility of changes to the ownership of law firms will be particularly interesting for the Big Four accountancies.
Law firm leaders have noted that the Big Four and other alternative legal service providers, all of whom are already mounting significant competition to traditional law firm services, could take advantage of such a change by opening new legal operations that compete more directly with law firms.
D.C.’s version of Rule 5.4 is already slightly less restrictive than the American Bar Association’s Model Rule 5.4 that most states have adopted, which forbids partnerships between lawyers and nonlawyers if any of the activities of the partnership consist of the practice of law.
Recent Posts on LawFuel
- Roger Racket’s Back – ‘Dirty Trickster’ Roger Stone Freed and Unleashed75 / 100 Powered by Rank Math SEO SEO Score Roger Stone the self confessed […]
- Ghislaine Maxwell Arrest Sees Prince Andrew Links To Obscure Lobbying Firm Propelled to prominence By A Kiwi Ambassador75 / 100 Powered by Rank Math SEO SEO Score Lawyers for Prince Andrew have […]
- How The Disintegrating Law Firm Hired By Rudy Giuliani Has Spawned Its Young75 / 100 Powered by Rank Math SEO SEO Score Dan Garner – Breaking up, […]
- Is The Berman Ouster in New York A Further Reflection of Trump Political Interference? Maybe Not With This Lawyer . .75 / 100 Powered by Rank Math SEO SEO Score The debacle surrounding the firing […]
- Boies Law Firm Upheaval Continues With 4 Partner Defection to King & Spalding75 / 100 Powered by Rank Math SEO SEO Score The turmoil at Boies Schiller […]
- Laying Zoom Bare – Holding Zoom Meetings Without Wearing Pants is Just Part of the Problem For Lawyers Using Zoom75 / 100 Powered by Rank Math SEO SEO Score The move to Zoom meetings, […]
- Who Are The Lawyers Helping Prince Andrew Keep Safe From US Law Enforcement Over Jeffrey Epstein?75 / 100 Powered by Rank Math SEO SEO Score As Prince Andrew faces increasing […]
- How Allen & Overy Has Dealt With The COVID Crisis . . And One Thing They Would Not Have Done Again75 / 100 Powered by Rank Math SEO SEO Score Allen & Overy is one […]
- Virage Capital Says Pierce Bainbridge – $70 Million in Debt – Double Dipped on Collateral75 / 100 Powered by Rank Math SEO SEO Score Dan Garner – Back in […]
- Archie Williams – The Innocence Project YouTube Star & The Lawyers Who Saw Him Free75 / 100 Powered by Rank Math SEO SEO Score Reality TV show ‘Americ’a Got […]