Promising Legal Startup Atrium Closes

Hybrid legal software and law firm startup Atrium has closed following a failure to deliver the delivery services it aimed to handle.

LawFuel reported last month on layoffs, but the legal startup has now laid off all employees, over 100, and will return over $75 million start-up funding to investors.

“I’m really grateful to the customers and the team members who came along with me and our investors. It’s unfortunate that this wasn’t the outcome that we wanted but we’re thankful to everyone that came with us on the journey,” said founder Justin Kan.

He’d previously founded Justin.tv, which pivoted to become Twitch and later sold to Amazon for $970 million. “We decided to call it and wind down the startup operations. There will be some capital returned to investors post wind-down,” Kan said.

 Atrium was founded in 2017 and built software for startups to navigate fundraising, hiring, acquisition deals and collaboration with lawyers.

The startups also offered in-house lawyers that could provide counsel and best practices in these matters. The idea was that the collaboration software would make its lawyers more efficient than a traditional law firm so they could get work done faster, translating to savings for clients and Atrium.

Atrium had attempted to pull back from its law services to become a pure startup operation, with a separate law operation as a standalone business. However despite the better margins promised by the tech business it was not something that was able to provide the efficiencies sought.

Latest LawTech News on LawFuel

• When a Software Bug Becomes a Legal Problem: What Businesses Should Know
• Legal AI – Can’t Work Without It: Why 15% of Big Law Attorneys Are Now Officially Dependent on AI
  According to fresh survey data from LexisNexis UK, 15% of lawyers at large commercial law firms now admit they are completely dependent on AI to carry out their daily legal work. The reliance is almost as pronounced in corporate legal departments, where 13% of in-house counsel report identical dependency. Artificial intelligence in the legal sector has crossed the rubicon from experimental pilot project to standard operating equipment. Log in to read ., .
• Is This Hidden AI Prompt a New Problem for Lawyers?
• Kirkland’s $500 Million AI Bet Isn’t About Speed. It’s About Killing the Billable Hour
  Kirkland & Ellis, the first law firm in history to break $10 billion in revenue, is putting half a billion dollars of its own money into a proprietary AI platform. That’s a big bold move (what else would you expect from Kirklands?) which is not to keep up with Harvey or Legora, or to shave a few hours off due diligence. It’s something far more valuable. The plan is to bottle the firm’s “collective intelligence” and put it in every lawyer’s hands and, in the process, lean hard into the long-predicted death of the billable hour. Log in to read –
• Legal AI has officially Entered Silly Money Territory
• Why Law Firms Are Rethinking Emergency IT Support and Investing in Proactive IT Support
• Safeguarding Legal Data in the Age of AI – Key Tips For Law Firms
• Meet James Sackl: The Deep-Tech Disruptor Forcing Big Law to Rethink Time
• Legal AI Unicorn Harvey Lands Major Backing from Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan
• The Kirklands vs. Latham AI Arms Race Sees Associates on the Front Line
• Legal AI News – Willkie Teams Up with OpenAI to Accelerate Firmwide AI Innovation and Proprietary Platforms