A Nelson lawyer’s attempts to have a travel ban imposed by Air New Zealand lifted after a display of bad behaviour n the Koru Lounge has been dismissed in a High Court decision by Justice Davison in the High Court, Auckland.
The lawyer, Anjela Sharma had sought an interim injunction to overturn the one-year ban involving a trip she was making with her family in December 2018 from Nelson, via Auckland to India.
The incident arose when a Koru member requested proof of Koru Lounge membership, resulting in Sharma claiming that her business class ticket to India combined with her own Koru membership entitled the family to be in the Lounge.
Anjela Sharma sought an interim injunction from the High Court at Auckland to overturn a one-year ban imposed by Air New Zealand.
Sharma said she and her family were travelling to India from Nelson in December 2018, when an Air New Zealand staff member asked for proof they were allowed to be in the Koru Lounge.
Sharma said, on her understanding, their business class tickets entitled the family to use the Koru Club Lounge at Nelson Airport, particularly as both she and her husband were Koru Lounge members.
Although Sharma and her husband were Koru members, none of their children were. The Koru Club policy allows for members to bring a maximum one guest.
Sharma said they were permitted to enter and remain in the Koru Lounge during a two-hour wait until their departure, after they showed a hostess their travel documentation to India.
However, while in the lounge, Sharma said her family was challenged on their eligibility.
Justice Davison said:
The report described the applicant and members of her family as being very loud, disruptive, and intimidating during their dealings with the Lounge hostess over their entitlement to use the Lounge. The report said that members of the applicant’s family called the Lounge hostess stupid and racist, and mocked and loudly mimicked her voice when she greeted other passengers entering the Lounge. The report further noted that at one point a member of the airport security staff was called to the Lounge and had offered to call the Police.
Justice Davison
Air New Zealand staff who dealt with Sharma and her family said she’d acted in an “intimidatory and bullying manner”.
“I feel Mrs Sharma uses bullying tactics to gain her own way every time she travels, we are always courteous and helpful to her, but she pushes the boundaries of decency every time she travels, and I would like to put a stop to her countless demands with us,” the report said.
The staff member said in the report Sharma and her family were not welcome in the Nelson Koru Lounge in the future and sought action to prevent this behaviour occurring in future.
Sharma claimed Air New Zealand wrote to her and alleged she and her family had been refused entry, entered the lounge without permission, and the family was loud and aggressive.
She said the airline issued a warning that she’d be banned if she didn’t follow the rules.
In March 2019, Sharma sent an email to former Air New Zealand chief executive Christopher Luxton disputing there was any justification for the warning letter.
Sharma continued to send communication and tried to check-in on a flight and accused a Nelson staff member of lying and being “on a venomous mission” against her, according to the decision.
An email was sent to Sharma on behalf of Luxton stating her correspondence had been “distasteful and insulting”.
Air New Zealand imposed a one year ban on July 2, 2019 which resulted in Sharma filing the High Court proceeding that claimed Air New Zealand was in breach of its contractual obligations to her as a passenger who had booked and paid for several flights she had not yet flown.
Sharma said she was dependent on travelling with Air New Zealand for both work-related travel and to maintain contact with family and for holidays, but Justice Davison said Air New Zealand had been ‘careful and measured’ in its response to the Sharma issue.
“It was only after she continued, despite the warning letter, to engage in what the respondent considered was unacceptable treatment of its staff, as well as indicating in her correspondence that she did not intend to desist, that the respondent finally made the decision to impose the ban.”
Justice Davison
Justice Davison noted that Sharma could use Sounds Air to travel to Wellington to use the JetStar service for her travel.
Weighing the competing interests, I find that the balance of convenience in this case strongly favours the respondent, and not making an order which would remove the ban it has imposed on the applicant pending determination of the applicant’s claim. Furthermore, should the applicant succeed in establishing her claim, any loss caused by a breach of contract can be adequately compensated by way of damages.
Justice Davison
Air New Zealand was entitled to costs on the application.
Recently on LawFuel
- From Atticus to Alicia: How 9 Iconic Fictional Lawyers Shape Our Legal DreamsThe Lawyers From Movies-to-Novels That Inspire Us Ben Boman, LawFuel contributing editor Fictional lawyers in literature, television, and movies have captured the… Read more: From Atticus to Alicia: How 9 Iconic Fictional Lawyers Shape Our Legal Dreams
- Another Big Boston Law Firm: Paul Hastings Launches OfficePaul Hastings has launched an office in Boston, with Alexander Temel, (pictured) formerly of Sidley Austin’s international private equity practice, leading the… Read more: Another Big Boston Law Firm: Paul Hastings Launches Office
- The Australian ‘Me Too’ Lawyer Standing Against Workplace BullyingThirty-four year old Australian lawyer Stefani Costi received high level publicity over her attempts to deal with workplace bullying in the law… Read more: The Australian ‘Me Too’ Lawyer Standing Against Workplace Bullying
- How One Big Law Partner Managers Stress and Personal TragedyMax Savoie, a partner at Sidley Austin in the payments and fintech practice, has shared his journey on Law.com navigating high-pressure legal… Read more: How One Big Law Partner Managers Stress and Personal Tragedy
- The Power Lawyer Moving From Big Law Giant to Consultancy LeaderMike McNamara’s New Role at Baretz+Brunelle Mike McNamara helped build Dentons into a global, legal powerhouse and has not become the inaugural… Read more: The Power Lawyer Moving From Big Law Giant to Consultancy Leader
- Australian Lawyers Stunned By Death Of Innovative Leader Who Found Law Firm ‘Sweet Spot’Juan Martinez a ‘Force of Nature’ Described by the firm he lead as a giant of the Australian legal profession, the shock… Read more: Australian Lawyers Stunned By Death Of Innovative Leader Who Found Law Firm ‘Sweet Spot’
- Trump’s Lawyer And His Bold Move – From Wall Street to Mar-a-Lago’s Defense FortressTrump’s Lawyer Lawyers start their own law firms for many reasons, but in the case of Donald Trump lawyer Todd Blanche the… Read more: Trump’s Lawyer And His Bold Move – From Wall Street to Mar-a-Lago’s Defense Fortress
- The Rock ‘n Roll Judge Moves OnFrom Mick Jagger to the Judicial Conduct Commissioner After spending 50 years in court, the lively and music-loving Judge David Ruth, often… Read more: The Rock ‘n Roll Judge Moves On
- Leading Family Lawyer Elected As Senior Partner at Harbottle & LewisLondon-based Harbottle & Lewis has elected family lawyer Catherine Bedford as its senior partner, making her the first woman to hold the… Read more: Leading Family Lawyer Elected As Senior Partner at Harbottle & Lewis
- Behind Closed Doors: Should Judges Belong to Men-Only Clubs Like The Garrick Club?The Judiciary has long had the boys club ring about it and the issue in the UK arose recently with a Guardian… Read more: Behind Closed Doors: Should Judges Belong to Men-Only Clubs Like The Garrick Club?