
You have no doubt heard the term Biglaw, but may not be able to place your finger on an exact definition. You are not alone in that.
Biglaw is an industry-specific nickname for high-revenue law firms with large headcounts. It can also refer to smaller firms that pay their lawyers a market rate salary, or even a medium-sized outfit with wide, international reach and notoriety.
All of these types of firms are typically headquartered in major US cities, like Los Angeles, New York, and Chicago, with multiple branches in smaller markets.
And, most notably, lawyers who work in Biglaw can expect to be paid based on the Cravath scale.
The Cravath Scale

The Cravath Scale, an offshoot of the Cravath system, is named after Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, the firm which is generally considered the authority on setting associate salaries. Its compensatory functions include factors like the number of years out of law school and particular law school classes, among others.
Lawyers on this pay scale not only earn the same salary but can also anticipate receiving the same annual market bonus. Based on the lockstep and closely monitored structure of the scale, if one firm offers an associate a higher salary, other firms tend to follow suit. But while this scale is based on a platform of consistency, changes have been experienced throughout the years.
To get a better understanding of how the Biglaw salary scale operates on a year-to-year basis, consider some examples of the history of trends certain law associates have experienced.
First Year Candidates
Needless to say, when fresh out of law school, successful first-year candidates have much to prove to the firms that take them on: long hours, dedicated work, limited time-off. But over the years, the take-home pay figures these associates earn may surprise you.
In 2006, about a year before the Great Recession, first-year associates in Biglaw firms earned an average salary of $145,000––with an additional $35,000 in bonuses, for a total of $180,000 (adjusted for inflation, this number is roughly $227,780).
. . in post-recession America, first-year associates earned about $5,000 less in 2009 than what the same grade of lawyers would earn ten years later.
Joshua Holt
By comparison, a first-year associate in 2019 earned $190,000 in salary and a further $15,000 in bonuses, for a total of $205,000. This would indicate that bonuses were higher pre-recession and have since decreased despite an increase in salary.
Compare these factors to the year at the end of the Great Recession. In 2009, first-year lawyers were paid, on average, $160,000 base salary, plus $7,500 in annual bonuses––for a total of $167,500. That same number, adjusted for inflation, is roughly $199,136. Therefore, in post-recession America, first-year associates earned about $5,000 less in 2009 than what the same grade of lawyers would earn ten years later. Additionally, a first-year lawyer in 2006 earned roughly $22,000 more than a first-year lawyer in 2019.
Mid-Tier Associates
Let’s take a look at another tier. Using the same dates, consider the salaries of mid-level associates. In 2006 (remember: a pre-recession year), a fifth-year lawyer working at a Biglaw firm earned a $200,000 salary and an additional $55,000 in bonuses for a total of $255,000. When adjusted for inflation, that figure is about $322,689.
Again, by comparison, a fifth-year associate in 2019 received a base salary of $280,000, this time with an additional $80,000 in bonuses, for a total of $360,000. Once we revisit a post-recession America, the numbers continue to demonstrate a shift. In 2009, fifth-year lawyers earned $230,000 in salary, with $25,000 in annual bonuses, for a total of $255,000. Adjusted for inflation: $303,162.
The Senior Associate
To fully grasp the impact of the salary scale, there is one last tier to consider: the senior associate. In 2007, lawyers in their eighth year of practice with Biglaw firms, took home $280,000 in salary and $110,000 in bonuses, totaling $390,000 (or $480,292 when adjusted for inflation). Two years later, the salary is the same (at $280,000) and the bonuses make a sharp drop down to $30,000 (for a total of $310,000––$368,550 with inflation).
By 2019, eighth-year lawyers are up to $345,000 in salary, plus around $100,000 in bonuses, for a total annual take-home pay of $445,000.
As you’ll notice, one consistent trend throughout the nearly fifteen-year timeframe is the significant decrease in bonus amounts for lawyers at all class levels during the recession years, followed by a sizable return to larger numbers in most recent years.
The Top Tier Firms
So, while there appear to be fluctuations within the Biglaw pay scale, there benefits to joining a top-tier firm are still numerous. Although salaries and bonuses garner most of the spotlight, Biglaw associates receive additional perks, including free meals for working late, as well as reimbursement for travel, entertaining clients and the all-important bar expenses.
Now that you have a better understanding of Biglaw––the pluses, the negatives, the inevitable economic impact(s)––would you still consider it worth the grade?
Author Bio

Joshua Holt is the publisher of BigLawInvestor and an associate at Goodwin Procter LLP. He may be contacted through LinkedIn and on Twitter.
- UK Law Firms See Another Equity Investment Into LawThe purchase of law firms by outside businesses has been a continuing theme for UK law firms and the latest has seen law firm Higgs… Read more: UK Law Firms See Another Equity Investment Into Law
- Why Are Top Lawyers Charging $3,000 Per Hour?How Top Legal Rates Are Reshaping the Legal Market in 2025 Ben Thomson, LawFuel contributing editor The legal profession recently witnessed a historic milestone that… Read more: Why Are Top Lawyers Charging $3,000 Per Hour?
- How an Aussie Firm Wants Your Cross-Border BriefsConflict-Free and Open for Business: Gadens’ Bid to Win Global Referrals If you’re a global firm sitting on a tasty Australia matter with awkward conflicts—or… Read more: How an Aussie Firm Wants Your Cross-Border Briefs
- Catastrophe of Chaos: When a Law Firm’s Rainmaker Dies Without a WillLawFuel Power Briefing: Moran & Associates, Attorneys, Florida Photo by Pavel Danilyuk on Pexels The sudden death of a law firm’s key partner, or rainmaker,… Read more: Catastrophe of Chaos: When a Law Firm’s Rainmaker Dies Without a Will
- The 5 Most-Asked Questions About Lawyers on Quora—And What Clients Really Want To KnowQuora Questions For Lawyers – The Top Queries Norma Harris, LawFuel contributing editor Quora is one of the largest Q&A platforms on the internet, attracting… Read more: The 5 Most-Asked Questions About Lawyers on Quora—And What Clients Really Want To Know
- The Next Gold Rush: BigLaw’s Hispanic Market StrategyPhoto by August de Richelieu on Pexels While a significant portion of the legal industry obsesses over quarterly M&A league tables and partner shuffles, a fundamental… Read more: The Next Gold Rush: BigLaw’s Hispanic Market Strategy
- AI Is Hiring and Firing – The Legal Jobs Recovery Nobody Asked ForFive Straight Months of Job Growth in Legal — But AI Is Replacing Your Paralegal Norma Harris, LawFuel contributing editor The US legal sector just… Read more: AI Is Hiring and Firing – The Legal Jobs Recovery Nobody Asked For
Read More on LawFuel
- A&O Shearman’s First Results: Big, Loud, and Not Quite Magic Circle RoyaltyA&O Shearman has unveiled its first set of financials since creating the world’s largest Anglo-American law firm — and for a stitched-together giant still working out how to share the same stationery, the numbers are healthy and partner pay too. Revenue hit £2.9 billion (US$3.7 billion) with pretax profit of £1.1 billion (US$1.4 billion). Average profit per equity partner landed at £2 million (US$2.6 million)
- Kirkland & Ellis Joins Four-Day Office Week Party (Reluctantly)The 4 Day Hard-Work Week Trend Sees Kirkland & Ellis Join Up Norma… Read more: Kirkland & Ellis Joins Four-Day Office Week Party (Reluctantly)
- Burford Capital Isn’t Just Financing Suits Anymore; It’s Trying to Own the Firm TooBurford Capital the litigation finance behemoth wants not just to bankroll lawsuits but to buy stakes in actual U.S. law firms. The move isn’t your garden-variety PE play; it’s a direct challenge to the profession’s no-capital-external-to-the-firm orthodoxy. Burford, under the ever-quotable Jonathan Molot, (pictured above) told the Financial Times he is floating a structure ripped from healthcare and accounting playbooks: split a law firm into two entities, a lawyer-owned practice handling client work, and a Managed Service Organization (MSO) holding assets and providing back‑office muscle in exchange for a cut. It’s a classic “external capital without violating ethics rules.”
- Am-Law A List – Who Climbed, Who Stalled?A-List 2025: Munger reigns, Jenner rockets, and who actually moved the needle The… Read more: Am-Law A List – Who Climbed, Who Stalled?
- FieldFisher Achieve A small Profit Gain with PEP At £1millionFieldfisher has achieved a small, three percent profit gain with its profits per… Read more: FieldFisher Achieve A small Profit Gain with PEP At £1million
- Weil IP Expansion Continues with Addition of Chris Henry and Gaby LaHatteNEW YORK, August 11, 2025: International law firm Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP… Read more: Weil IP Expansion Continues with Addition of Chris Henry and Gaby LaHatte
- Hot Summer Bonuses At BigLaw Conceal A SecretFollowing months of market uncertainty, the summer bonus season at BigLaw has exceeded expectations with Milbank’s announcing special bonuses ranging from $6,000 to $25,000 for associates, a cascade of firms has followed suit. But a new trend is also emerging in the way compensation is being handed to associates. While partners enjoy increased PEP rates with premium work, the competitive world of associate recruitment is seeing some major changes in the way law firms handle the compensation for their top performers at associate level. The summer bonus season is seeing that trend play out.