The Law Firm Opportunities You Need to Know From the COVID-19 Pandemic: How Lawyers Are Seeing Urgent Demand For Specific Services

Ben Lowrey – Law firms face challenges with the COVID-19 pandemic, but also law firm opportunities as demand for legal services in some areas boom.

Lawyers globally are facing requests for urgent advice on businesses needing to deal with redundancy and other issues relating to employment law, health law, privacy, insurance and commercial law issues, senior law rights and other issues creates demands in an unprecedented upsurge in demand.

A LawFuel survey of some of the urgent issues developing with the COVID-19 virus shows that firms are being asked to provide a growing laundry list of questions relating to the pandemic from London to New York and Sydney to Singapore.

Among the issues are questions about positive testing for coronavirus to how to advise employees afraid of catching the virus at the office.

Law firms are quickly responding to the pandemic with a variety of resources and are creating multidisiciplinary task forces set up to deal with the issues arising from the pandemic.

Law Firm Opportunities

But within the crisis there lies opportunities for law firms who are looking at the both long and short-term impact of the pandemic which can develop demand for legal services in various areas of practice.

Lawyers are being asked to consider their employment contracts in terms of redundancy issues and ‘force majeure’ questions.

Firms are being asked to evaluate the insurance position relating to business interruption, workers compensation, casualty and other insurance issues affecting their business.

This has also meant assistance renegotiating commercial and credit arrangements, for instance, and ensuring businesses proactively engage with stockholders, creditors and other stakeholders to ensure that all legal and financial obligations are met.

But lawyers also face issues relating to privacy of medical records and their need to protect employees and contractors from infection.

In the US, the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPPA) means that there are liability issues for employers who discover that employees are sick but need to both proect their other employees and also the privacy of their workers.

With the COVID-19 epidemic, attorneys say businesses have a heightened duty to determine whether to direct staff to stay at home and that involves calibrating their investigations of workplace safety and confidential medical information about employees.

Firms indicate that their is some ‘pre-aggressive’ confidential questioning involving queries about any contact an employee may have with any known carrier of coronavirus or someone who has been exposed to it.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention say that employers do not have a duty to take the temperature of staff, but rather to base their decisions on what they know or should reasonably know.

A failure to handle the issue could be a negiligent retention, resulting in liability for the business.

Whatever the case, businesses need to stay aware of health and public announcements regarding COVID-19.

Further issues can arise under US law when an employee cannot come to work. Under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) employers must ensure their is compliance along with other State laws that may apply.

The FMLA requires employers with more than 50 employees within 75 miles of the company’s worksite to provide employees with a number of requirements that require careful attention, including job-protected, unpaid leave for specific medical and family reasons.

Employees who take FMLA leave are entitled to receive the same health coverage from their employers as they were before taking leave.

Demand for Health Care Lawyers

Demand for lawyers specializing in health care have exploded with the COVID-19 pandemic.

Apart from company clients health care facilities and others must also comply with legal requirements regarding ways they must comply with the virus where patients have shown symptoms of the virus.

But additional to the patients is the issue of protecting employees and the broader community, giving rise to an array of legal issues.

The evolving demands placed upon health care lawyers will continue to develop as the pandemic unfolds, but understanding the various issues as they interface with labor law and privacy issues will present a demand for legal clarity that will continue to challenge clients and lawyers alike.

The major firms, like DLA Piper with their COVID-19 resource center, Allen + Overy with their HR-related resource center, Shearman & Sterling’s COVID-19 resources and many more, including specialist firms working in health law, privacy, insurance and commercial law.

COVID-19 Privacy Issues

Privacy rights are another key area of intense legal interest. Privacy of health care issues are always important, even in normal times, but there are increasingly urgent and sensitive questions that arise in times like this.

The rights of individuals to their privacy is absolute, but it may be overridden in many jurisdictions where it is necessary and proportionate to the extraordinary circumstances such as those currently being experienced.

Data protection and legal rights relating patients permits the use of the information to be defined in a narrow manner, but in times of pandemic it may be that privacy lawyers are working to hinder the appropriate response to COVID-19.

Certainly privacy and data protection rights are being focused upon by law firms that are being asked to do so.

These concerns are global in nature and most jurisdictions strictly enforce the way in which health care data can and should be used.

In Europe, for instance, the European Data Protection Board and the ICO have both issued statements designed to assist employers and public bodies, so it is unlikely that organisations will find themselves in trouble for processing personal information where it is necessary to do so to treat patients or protect their staff.

The law firm opportunities that continue to arise out of the COVID-19 crisis will continue to evolve and develop, but it is clear that labor law, health and privacy concerns are among the paramount areas of demand from clients seeking assistance from their law firms.

Recently on LawFuel

• The OpenAI Defense: Inside the Wachtell Trial Team That Just Beat Elon Musk
  While Elon Musk’s legal team tried to transform a federal courtroom in Oakland, California into an existential debate about the fate of human civilization and a “stolen charity,” Sam Altman’s defenders quietly built a procedural guillotine. A unanimous nine-member federal advisory jury took less than two hours to reject all of Musk’s claims against OpenAI, CEO Sam Altman, and President Greg Brockman, which presumably was both surprising and disappointing for the multi-billionaire. U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers immediately adopted the verdict from the bench, dismissing the case in full. The same statute-of-limitations finding wiped out Musk’s aiding-and-abetting claim against Microsoft, an early backer of OpenAI’s for-profit arm. Log in to the the lawyer profiles . . .
• The $8 Billion Fight That Shows Why Litigation Is Still the City’s Ultimate Blood Sport
  A monster battle is unfolding in the sprawling claim against audit powerhouse PwC, born from the spectacular implosion of Chinese property behemoth China Evergrande, the most indebted property group in the world. Senior silks like Richard Handyside KC, the Fountain Court Chambers’ Head, are facing off against those from 3 Verulam Buildings (3VB) where Adrian Beltrami KC  represents the liquidators as they battle over allegations of negligence and misrepresentation in the $8.4 billion battle. The numbers are eye-watering, even by City standards. Evergrande’s liquidators (led by Alvarez & Marsal’s Edward Middleton and Tiffany Wong) are pursuing 57 billion yuan (roughly $8.4 billion) in damages from PwC International, PwC Hong Kong, and PwC’s mainland China arm. They allege serious audit negligence and misrepresentation in the years leading up to Evergrande’s historic collapse, a King-sized property failure in a long list of major property failures. Log in to read more . . .
• Paul Weiss Loses Two More Litigation Partners As Rivals Keep Picking Off Its Bench
• Panel Games: Revolut’s New Legal Model is a Quarterly Hunger Games for Big Law
  If you’re a partner at a Magic Circle firm currently leaning back in your Herman Miller chair, comforted by the warmth of a three-year panel appointment, you might want to sit up. The fintech disruptor that refuses to play by the rules is, predictably, about to break yours. Revolut, the neobank recently valued at a staggering $45 billion following a secondary share sale (with some internal projections whispering closer to $75 billion), is officially binning the traditional legal panel model. In its place comes “Revolut Partners,” a system designed to treat law firms less like venerable institutions and more like high-performance software vendors. Log in to read more . .
• The Happiest Lawyers In America Work At These Firms — And The Race For #1 Is Now A Photo Finish
  Vault’s 2026-2027 rankings reveal O’Melveny still leads on satisfaction by a hair, Morgan Lewis took the overall crown, and Ropes & Gray jumped 36 spots. Vault just dropped its 2026-2027 Best Law Firms to Work For rankings, and for anyone watching BigLaw’s talent map, the satisfaction data is the most useful slice on the platter. It tells you, in cold associate-survey numbers, where lawyers are actually happy versus merely well-paid — and right now those two things are diverging at the top end of the market in interesting ways. Log in to see who won the industry record . .
• How a Box of Hong Kong Cupcakes Triggered a $36m Law Partner Meltdown
  Quick question: “If a star rainmaker built ‘their’ office, do they get to secretly take it with them – or does the partnership own everything they touch?” When the Australian Financial Review recently devoted a major feature to “the $36 million box of Hong Kong cupcakes”, it wasn’t really about baked goods – it was about how a high‑performing litigation boutique managed to blow itself up in plain sight. Log in to see what happened . . .
• $230bn in Five Days, Two Partners Out the Door – Wachtell’s High-Stakes Reckoning
  The firm that pays its partners $12 million a year just can’t stop losing them. Here’s why that paradox may be the most important story in Big Law right now. Wachtell Lipton broke every profitability record in Am Law 100 history in 2026 — and watched nine partners walk out the door to rivals offering something the numbers alone couldn’t match. What’s really driving the exodus from Wall Street’s most envied firm, whether the lockstep model can survive the age of the $80 million guarantee, and what it all means for the future of elite legal practice: it’s all inside. Log in to read the breaking Big Law story . .
• The Elite Law Pipeline to Prison And How a Decade-Long Insider Trading Ring Pierced Big Law’s Inner Circle
  A 30-person federal indictment has implicated attorneys from Wachtell, Latham, Willkie, Goodwin, Cleary, Sidley, Weil and DLA Piper in what prosecutors call one of the most sweeping M&A intelligence networks ever prosecuted on American soil. The access a law firm grants its attorneys is built on a simple, foundational covenant: what comes through the door stays within those walls. For a decade, federal prosecutors allege, a network of Ivy League-trained lawyers decided that covenant was negotiable — and that confidential merger data was simply a different kind of billable asset. L:og in to read more . . .
• Paul Weiss Sheds Litigation Associates Citing Performance Reviews as Firm Navigates Litigation Slowdown
  Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison has parted ways with several litigation associates following its annual performance review cycle, possibly marking a structural change from the relatively recently annointed firm chair Scott Barshay (pictured). According to reporting by The American Lawyer, the New York-based firm, which has long prided itself on avoiding public layoffs, including during the 2008 financial crisis and the 2022 financial correction . . Log in to read more . . .
• A&O Shearman Job Cuts Amidst Post-Merger Push For Tech-Driven Ops
• Average Lawyer Salary 2026: BLS Data by State, Practice Area & Experience
  If you are a lawyer reviewing your options in 2026, the latest data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and major legal compensation surveys makes one thing clear: location, specialty, and experience still dictate everything. The national median lawyer salary stands at $151,160 as of the BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) survey for May 2024 — the most recent official release — with approximately 747,750 lawyers in paid employment across the country. The national mean wage for lawyers is $182,760, reflecting how strongly the top earners pull the average upward. Log in for the full report . .