Dan Garner – The conviction of high profile lawyer Michael Avenatti last week has seen another in the slew of Pierce Bainbridge clients who have been dealt hammer-blow legal results. Pierce Bainbridge Managing Partner John Pierce, given to adopting a macho-Marine manner regarding his firm’s prowess and clients will doubtless be disappointed in the reversal.
Pierce Bainbridge were not lawyers in the Avenatti trial, but their roster of high profile clients includes the brash attorney known for his representation of stripper Stormy Daniels, his Trump-baiting and now his conviction on wire fraud and extortion charges.
Other high profile Pierce Bainbridge clients include Don Lemon, Carter Page, Rudy Giuiliani (right), Tulsi Gabbard, Lenny Dykstra, George Papadopolous and Joan Dangerfield (Rodney Dangerfield’s wife.)
The firm has also retained Mark “The Lawyer at the Center of Trump’s Universe” Mukasey, of Mukasey Frenchman and Sklaroff, as outside counsel for the litigation we described as the John Grisham Legal Thriller involving former Pierce Bainbridge partner Don Lewis, Putney Twombly and Littler Mendelson.
All of which means Big names. Big spotlight. Big expectations.
“Rock Solid Facts” or Not?
The bombast from John Pierce appears to be inviting a healthy dose of criticism and ridicule from both inside and outside the firm.
In an article in Law 360 recently Pierce said:
“There are a few things that remain rock solid facts of life whether the industry likes it or not . . . we win almost everything we touch, and within a few to several years we will be the most dominant and profitable global litigation firm.”
The hype and hope for positive results are eluding the firm with a former Pierce’s partner characterising Pierce in derogatory terms (“totally bonkers”, “crazy person”).
Avenatti was reportedly accompanied by Pierce Bainbridge partner Tom Warren during a hearing in front of the California State Bar.
The recent trial result does not support Pierce’s “winning everything we touch” talk and continues the flow of bad news emanating from the law firm.
The bad news has come in a steady stream, including:
- Pierce Bainbridge clients – Avenatti and Papadopoulos – ending up in metal bracelets
- $9,157,072.95 default on a “funding agreement” declared by litigation funder Pravati. The debt was apparently eventually “terminated.” It appears that another funder replaced Pravati. (Original 2017 Pravati filing and a March 2019 amendment)
- Almost 20 attorneys, at least 8 of them partners, quitting Pierce Bainbridge in the last several months
- Accusations by a Philadelphia lawyer that Pierce Bainbridge allegedly pays off plaintiffs to secure them as clients
- A cottage industry of plaintiff “dance move” copyright cases filed, with every single one ending in a loss. One journalist observed:
“Despite its 100 per cent failure rate in Fortnite lawsuits, Pierce Bainbridge is still finding plaintiffs willing to ensure its partners keep collecting paychecks. And isn’t that the greatest victory of all?”
Pierce Bainbridge Jury Results
As for results achieved by the firm, the only reported jury victory over the life of the firm netted a recovery of around $500,000.
The trial lasted three weeks, and at least seven firm attorneys appeared throughout the matter. The attorneys (and their prior firms) included: Andrew Lorin (Drinker Biddle & Reath), Conor McDonough (Paul Weiss), Michael M. Pomerantz (Grais & Ellsworth), John M. Pierce (K&L Gates), Ted Folkman (Murphy & King) and Stacey Villagomez (formerly of PB, now of Allen & Matkins).
Seven attorneys and a $500,000 net recovery, shared between the firm, the client and the litgation financier does not bring words like “dominant” and “profitable” to mind.
The Avenatti Crystal Ball
While Pierce Bainbridge does not appear to have been involved directly in the Avenatti trial, he was a firm client and the relationship was touted by the firm.
Avenatti became a media celebrity until the Nike conviction, but it was his representation of stripper Stormy Daniels that propelled him to talk- and mediashow stardom, feted by media celebs Left and Right.
The disgraced lawyer, like Giuliani, tweeted about Pierce Bainbridge; the partners in the Guiliani tweet, Eric Creizman and Melissa Madrigal, quit just months later and are now at Armonsrong Teasedale.
Pierce – who claims he was a “M1A1 Abrams Tank Platoon Leader in the Army’s 1st Cavalry Division” – remarked on Avenatti’s future a while back.
Pierce’s partner, Caroline Polisi, appears to have had a better crystal ball; perhaps her background helped.
According to her firm bio, Polisi has experience handling cases involving “Ponzi schemes” and more; Polisi also appears on “on CNN, MSNBC, CBS and Fox News analyzing federal criminal law.”
The “Ponzi Scheme” work experience is notable given the explosive financial allegations captured in paragraphs 8-20, 38-40 and 193-224 in Lewis’s complaint; allegations which partner Denver G. Edwards has said, “if true, would constitute criminal activity.”
In October 2018, Polisi penned an article on CNN.com titled: “Where Avenatti’s Winning Streak Comes to an End.” One can parse meaning, circumstances and details, but the suggestion is that Polisi believed Avenatti’s overall gig was about to be up. Polisi appears to have been several steps ahead of her “Warrior Spirit” boss Pierce.
The “Tank Platoon Leader”
LawFuel.com’s first coverage of the firm raised concerns about the financial dealings and leadership of the firm by the tough-talking, self-described “tank platoon leader” Pierce with bravado about “kevlar skin” and the like.
Other media have also reported on issues emanating from the firm. For example, Techdirt.com, also on Valentine’s Day, wrote a scathing piece titled – “Trouble At The Law Firm Filing Patently Ridiculous Lawsuits On Behalf Of Tulsi Gabbard.”
And Leaders League also recently pilloried the Pierce Bainbridge, opining: “Any funder that takes a bet on the firm now would be very brave to do so.”
The drama at Pierce Bainbridge continues with Avenatti’s downfall, even though Pierce Bainbridge did not appear at the trial of their high profile client.
Pierce Bainbridge: The FTC Prosecution, The Mystery Money Man & The Continuing Story
Recent Headlines on LawFuel
- Royal Reckoning – The Legal Anatomy of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s ArrestLawFuel Law Briefing – In what legal historians are already calling a watershed moment, a former… Read more: Royal Reckoning – The Legal Anatomy of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s Arrest
- How Brad Karp Lost the Plot: David Lat’s Forensic Dissection of the Paul Weiss Chairman’s DownfallBigLaw • Analysis The Karp Collapse: David Lat Dissects the Emails That Ended an Era at… Read more: How Brad Karp Lost the Plot: David Lat’s Forensic Dissection of the Paul Weiss Chairman’s Downfall
- Legal Market Analysis – BigLaw’s Lateral Frenzy Is Reshaping the MarketThe Perkins Coie exodus in Seattle signals a permanent shift in the lateral hiring labor market that is changing the way top law firms operate. Lateral hiring is no longer just a tactic but an entire business model. When Perkins Coie lost lawyers to the announcement new offices for Morrison Foerster and McGuireWoods. It was in fact a signal of something structural. The departures came as Perkins Coie prepares for its merger with Ashurst, a combination that will create a global platform of roughly 3,000 lawyers. The timing reveals a pattern that now defines elite legal practice: mergers create opportunity, but they also create instability. And instability is oxygen for competitors. What we are witnessing is not a phase. It is the emergence of lateral acquisition as BigLaw’s dominant growth strategy. The New Economics: Why Firms Are Buying Revenue
- Clooneys Team Up with Legal Heavyweight Quinn Emanuel To Don the Cape for Global JusticeIn a world where celebrity philanthropy often feels like a scripted sequel, the Clooney Foundation for Justice (CFJ) – that noble venture launched in 2016 by Amal Clooney, the hard-wired international barrister from Doughty Street Chambers, and her silver-screen spouse George – has rolled out its Justice Champion Program with all the flair of a premiere. Snagging litigation titan Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan as the inaugural partner, this initiative promises a pro bono powerhouse to shield at-risk women from discrimination and violence, while springing journalists from unjust detention for daring to ink the truth.
- Meet Scott Barshay – Paul Weiss’s New Chairman and Wall Street’s Most Prolific M&A LawyerFrom Cravath Star to Paul Weiss Chair Ben Thomson, LawFuel contributing writer In one of the… Read more: Meet Scott Barshay – Paul Weiss’s New Chairman and Wall Street’s Most Prolific M&A Lawyer
- Brad Karp’s Paul Weiss Exit – When ‘Once in a Lifetime’ Evenings Come Back to Haunt YouBrad Karp’s 18-year reign atop Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison ended Wednesday night not with a bang, but with a carefully worded statement about “distractions.” Translation: the Justice Department’s release of millions of Epstein-related documents last week made his position untenable faster than you can say “conflict of interest.” The emails paint a picture that’s more uncomfortable than a BigLaw associate’s billable hours target. In July 2015, Karp thanked Epstein for “an evening I’ll never forget,” describing it as “truly ‘once in a lifetime’ in every way, though I hope to be invited again.” Epstein’s response? A promise of “many many nights of unique talents” and assurances Karp would “be invited often.” Spoiler alert: those invitations are now exhibit A in why being Chair of a white-shoe law firm and socialising with convicted sex offenders don’t mix well.
- Anthropic’s Legal AI Plugin Triggers ‘SaaSpocalypse’ — $50B Wiped from Legal Tech StocksAnthropic’s Legal AI Plugin Exposes the Vulnerability of the Legal Tech Emperor’s Wardrobe The legal software… Read more: Anthropic’s Legal AI Plugin Triggers ‘SaaSpocalypse’ — $50B Wiped from Legal Tech Stocks
- Legal AI’s First Reality Check: What the Claude Shock Means for Law FirmsAI-driven software stocks have slumped as investors suddenly re-price the risks and disruption posed by legal-focused models like Anthropic’s Claude. But for law firms, this is a reset, not a retreat, in the legal AI market. The money is shifting from “AI at any price” to “AI that can survive the coming copyright and compliance storm”—and that is clearly where serious firms should now be focusing. What Actually Happened in Markets The numbers are staggering. On 3 February 2026, a Goldman Sachs basket of US software stocks sank 6% in a single session—its biggest one-day decline since April’s tariff-fueled selloff. A parallel index of financial services firms tumbled almost 7%. The Nasdaq 100 Index fell as much as 2.4%. The trigger? Anthropic released new AI automation capabilities targeting legal, sales, marketing, and data analytics—sectors previously thought insulated from AI disruption. The carnage was immediate and global:
- Why Was Jeffrey Epstein Trying to Get BigLaw’s Brad Karp Into Augusta National?The Augusta Connection: Why Did Jeffrey Epstein Want to Get Brad Karp Into America’s Most Exclusive… Read more: Why Was Jeffrey Epstein Trying to Get BigLaw’s Brad Karp Into Augusta National?
- BigLaw Pay – Taylor Wessing’s Top Rainmaker Banks the Legal Equivalent of a Premier League SalaryTaylor Wessing’s highest-earning partner managed to haul in a whopping £200,000 a week in the latest financial year — that’s roughly the same as a Premier League striker on a good bonus season. It highlights just how ludicrous top-end pay has become in London’s legal market. According to Law Society Gazette, the top-paid LLP member at Taylor Wessing managed to net that £200k-a-week haul as profits were dished out across the partnership. That kind of pay packet makes even the notorious Cravath scale seem almost modest. Sure, mid-market firms can cry “but we’re all about work-life balance,” but when your top partner’s annual take amounts to north of £10m, it’s hard not to feel the sting of disparity.
- California Draws a Line on Legal AI And Lawyers Need to Pay AttentionFor years, lawyers have been quietly experimenting with generative AI while publicly pretending it was all very theoretical. That luxury just expired however has expired as the California passes a first-of-its kind bill that will doubtless be replicated in other jurisdictions. The California Senate has passed SB 574 aimed squarely at how lawyers use artificial intelligence in legal practice. If it becomes law, California will be the first major jurisdiction to formally regulate AI use by lawyers, not with vague principles, but with obligations that cut straight to competence, ethics, and liability. In short: lawyers can use AI, but they own the consequences. And that’s something many will find daunting given the hallucinations and legal repercussions of legal AI’s misuse.
- Winston & Strawn and Taylor Wessing Partners Greenlight £1.2bn Transatlantic Law MergerPartners at Winston & Strawn and Taylor Wessing have voted decisively in favour of their landmark transatlantic merger, clearing the path for the creation of Winston Taylor—a new legal powerhouse set to launch in May 2026. The combination, reported last month, will create a firm with more than 1,400 lawyers worldwide and combined revenue exceeding $1.75 billion, positioning the newly-formed entity just outside the Global 200’s top 40 firms. The merger responds to increasing client demand for seamlessly integrated US–UK–EU counsel for the businesses, people, and markets driving capital and innovation.
