Record Growth in Chinese Investment in US & Europe

Baker & McKenzie – Combined Chinese direct investment in the advanced economies of North America and Europe more than doubled in 2016 to a new record of USD 94.2 billion* as China continued its transition to a new growth model, in line with its rapidly maturing economy.

fdi_bannerFDI flows rose a combined total of 130% from the previous benchmark of USD 41 billion, set in 2015. Acquisitions drove activity, accounting for 97% of FDI value.

For the first time since 2013, Chinese investors poured more money into North America (USD 48 billion, up 189%) than Europe (USD 46 billion, up 90%), with the US accounting for 94% of the North American total.  This was against a backdrop of global Chinese outbound investment hitting a new high in 2016 of almost USD 200 billion.

Privately-owned Chinese companies led the trend, outpacing investment by state-owned enterprises to close deals accounting for 70% of the total, signaling the continued rise of corporate China in the global economy.

However, the outlook is mixed as 2016 also saw 30 cancelled deals (20 in Europe, 10 in US), worth an unprecedented USD 74 billion. Whilst 2017 is likely to be another strong year as previously announced deals reach financial close, the number of newly announced Chinese acquisitions in Europe and North America has dipped since an exceptional first half of 2016.

Well over half of all Chinese direct investment into Europe and North America since 2000 has taken place in the last three years, marking the continued influence of globalization and the rapid development of China’s economy. The deal pipeline is strong in both Europe and North America, but political and regulatory uncertainties are weighing on the outlook. A short term slowdown in new deals is likely in 2017, driven both by China’s temporary measures to slow capital outflows and tougher screening of inbound deals in the US and Europe.
Michael DeFranco, Global Head of M&A at Baker McKenzie

The scale of recent investment, counterbalanced by growing numbers of troubled transactions, is revealed by data previewing Baker McKenzie’s forthcoming report with Rhodium Group, which is unique in analyzing patterns of Chinese investment in the two regions’ high-income economies. The full report will be published later in February.

Highlights in Europe

In Europe, Chinese investors focused on Germany and the UK, which between them saw 46% of all investment in Europe.

Germany saw inbound deals from China rise nearly tenfold, from USD 1.3 billion in 2015 to USD 12.1 billion last year. The UK attracted USD 9 billion of investment, an increase of 130% on 2015. The UK total was driven by deals announced prior to the EU referendum closing in the second half of the year, making it too early to judge the impact of Brexit.

Finland, Switzerland and Ireland were also major recipients of Chinese FDI in 2016, attracting USD 7.6 billion, USD 4.8 billion and USD 2.9 billion, respectively. Switzerland would have been the largest recipient if not for pending regulatory approval delaying the closing of ChemChina’s acquisition of Syngenta. Meanwhile, Italy, Portugal and France saw investment drop 85%, 50% and 40% in 2016 as Chinese investors focused on integrating large acquisitions they made in those countries in 2015.

“2016 set a new record high for global Chinese investment, with the UK performing particularly well and noticeably up on the previous year,” said M&A partner Tim Gee. “Much of that activity was driven by deals announced in the first half of the year, making it a particularly fast start. Whilst Brexit clouds the outlook for 2017 in some sectors, such as financial services, the fundamental drivers for Chinese FDI into the UK and Europe as a whole remain strong.”

Highlights in Canada and US

The US largely accounted for the increase in North America, with Chinese investments rising by almost 200% from 2015 to 2016 to USD 45.6 billion. Deals into Canada also rose 120% in value to reach a three-year high. Larger average deal size drove overall value up, with deal volumes stable.

With more than USD 16 billion of deals in 2016, California was the largest recipient of Chinese capital, reflecting interest in key sectors such as information technology, entertainment, real estate and logistics. New York was also a major recipient, though real estate investments accounted for 90% of value.

Several US states saw major investments from China for the first time in 2016, primarily following very large individual transactions of companies headquartered in those states. These include Kentucky with more than USD 9 billion. Investment in Illinois, Minnesota and Georgia also rose.

Bigger deals; more diverse sectors

In Europe, information and communications technology (USD 13.7 billion), transportation, utilities and infrastructure (USD 12.2 billion) and industrial machinery (USD 6.2 billion) saw the most activity. Those three sectors accounted for almost 70% of total Chinese investment. It was a record year for IT investment in Europe, outstripping levels in North America, historically targeted for IT deals.

In North America, Chinese investment is spread more evenly across different industries. The main recipients in 2016 were real estate and hospitality (USD17.4 billion), transport, utilities and infrastructure (USD 6.0 billion), consumer products and services (USD 5.7 billion), and entertainment (USD 4.8 billion). Together these accounted for nearly 70% of Chinese investment in the region.

Average deal value more than doubled year-on-year to USD 290 million across both regions combined.

State-owned enterprises’ share of investment fell to less than 30% of total FDI value in 2016 and purely financial investments also declined in importance in favor of real economy deals, falling from 53% of deal value in North America in 2015 to 29% last year as large Chinese corporations made more of the deals.

“Investment in both North America and Europe is now mostly driven by private companies making strategic investments to grow their core areas of business,” said Danian Zhang, chief representative of Baker McKenzie’s Shanghai office. “Chinese companies are growing market share, moving up value chains and investing in know-how to drive domestic and international demand for their goods and services.”

Strong fundamentals; troubled deals on the rise

The underlying trend of more outbound deals by Chinese investors is set to continue as corporate China emerges as a mainstay of global cross-border investment, building in consumer-facing sectors and diversifying asset bases. Europe and North America are among the most attractive markets for deals in support of these goals.

Chinese President Xi Jinping’s strong defence of the benefits of economic integration and free trade at the recent World Economic Forum in Davos indicates continued encouragement for Chinese companies to go global.

The number of pending transactions will make 2017 another strong year if they close as expected. These include the USD 43 billion Syngenta acquisition, which would almost single-handedly set a new record for Chinese FDI in Europe.

However, Chinese investment would have been higher in both regions in 2016 if not for the number of cancelled deals also reaching a record 30 deals worth over USD 74 billion.  In Europe, 20 deals involving Chinese investors worth USD 15.5 billion did not proceed. In North America the figure was 10 deals worth USD 59 billion.

“Annual direct Chinese investment in Europe and North America has risen from USD 2.6 billion a decade ago to more than USD 94 billion last year. The increase in cancelled deals is primarily a function of this growth as there will always be a proportion of announced investments that do not proceed for commercial reasons,” said Thomas Gilles, head of Baker McKenzie’s EMEA-China Group. “Chinese companies are also making more multi-billion dollar megadeals. Deals of that size and complexity are always more challenging from a regulatory perspective, regardless of the nationality of the buyer. That said, greater political and regulatory scrutiny makes for a more challenging outlook in the near-term. Political risk assessment and regulatory planning is increasingly important as part of an overall deal strategy.”

Chinese regulators informally tightened controls on outbound investments in late 2016 as the devaluation of RMB risked some companies taking advantage of outbound investments as a way to move capital out of China. The short-term controls slow down capital outflows, bringing many deals, real estate investments and some financial transactions under greater scrutiny. While evolving policies may create some approval hurdles and extend project times, it will not change the general direction of China’s overall outbound strategy and policy.

Meanwhile, in both North America and Europe, officials have intervened to block several technology acquisitions by Chinese investors due to national security concerns. “While the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) has been consistent in its approach, the volume and nature of the deals have produced more challenging transactions, with US officials coordinating with counterparts in other advanced economies,” observed Rod Hunter, a policy and regulatory partner based in Washington, DC.

In addition, members of Congress are expected to consider legislative proposals to tighten CFIUS reviews for technology deals and possibly to impose new measures to evaluate whether an investor’s country of origin provides reciprocal investment access.

“While many Chinese companies have become astute buyers in navigating regulatory procedures such as CFIUS national security reviews, it will become increasingly important for Chinese investors in the United States to develop a political risk assessment and regulatory plan as part of an overall deal strategy,” noted Sylwia Lis, a partner who has represented foreign investors before CFIUS.

More generally, the popular backlash against aspects of globalization in the US and a number of European countries is turning industrial and investment policies towards national economic priorities, potentially complicating large inbound deals.

*Completed transactions only; includes both greenfield investments and acquisitions that result in an equity stake of 10% or higher; data from Rhodium Group unless otherwise indicated

Leave a Comment