Class Action Lawsuit Against Oshkosh Corporation Announced by The Brualdi Law Firm

NEW YORK, Sept. 26, 2008 (LAWFUEL) — The Brualdi Law Firm, P.C.
announces that a lawsuit has been commenced in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin on behalf of
purchasers of Oshkosh Corporation (“Oshkosh” or “the Company”)
(NYSE:OSK) common stock during the period between November 1, 2007 and
June 25, 2008 (the “Class Period”) for violations of federal securities
laws.

No class has yet been certified in the above action. Until a class is
certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. If
you purchased Oshkosh common stock during the Class Period, and wish to
move the court for appointment of lead plaintiff, you must do so by
November 18, 2008. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on
behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. The lead
plaintiff will be selected from among applicants claiming the largest
loss from investment in the Company during the Class Period. You do not
need to seek appointment as a lead plaintiff in order to share in any
recovery.

To be a member of the class you need not take any action at this time,
and you may retain counsel of your choice. If you wish to discuss this
action or have any questions concerning this Notice or your rights or
interests with respect to these matters, please contact Sue Lee at The
Brualdi Law Firm, P.C. 29 Broadway, Suite 2400, New York, New York
10006, by telephone toll free at (877) 495-1187 or (212) 952-0602, by
email to [email protected] or visit our website at
http://www.brualdilawfirm.com.

The complaint alleges that, during the Class Period, defendants
materially misled the investing public, thereby inflating the price of
Oshkosh’s common stock, by publicly issuing materially false and
misleading statements and omitting to disclose material facts necessary
to make defendants’ statements not false and misleading. As alleged in
the complaint, these statements and omissions were materially false and
misleading in that they failed to disclose the following adverse facts
which were known to defendants, or recklessly disregarded by them: (a)
that synergies related to Oshkosh’s European facility rationalization
program for its refuse business, the Geesink Norba Group, were lower
and the cost of such rationalization was higher than represented; (b)
that the value of Oshkosh’s European refuse business was impaired and
overstated and should have been written down; (c) that Oshkosh’s JLG
access-equipment division was experiencing a dramatic decrease in
demand; and (d) that, as a result of the foregoing, Oshkosh lacked any
reasonable basis to maintain its financial guidance for fiscal 2008.

More information on this and other class actions can be found on the
Class Action Newsline at www.globenewswire.com/ca.

Scroll to Top